Best for a controlled manual process
A familiar starting point when the team has time to read, enter, and verify the requirements.
Start with the fields that make a register useful: a specific action, CSI section, source page and paragraph, responsible party, dates, and review status.
Free to use on your projects. No email required.
A familiar starting point when the team has time to read, enter, and verify the requirements.
Processes the manual, prepares the draft, and keeps source evidence connected during review.
Use SubmittalsHQ to build and review the register, then export for the project’s working process.
Record the project-manual issue, included addenda, reviewer, review date, and scope before entering requirements. That small step establishes what the register represents and makes later updates easier to explain.
Use the blank register for project work and the example register to see how specific action titles, types, source references, parties, and statuses fit together.
Review Division 01 and the applicable technical sections. Enter specific deliverables and retain their source references. Do not create rows from general procedural language, product descriptions, or every occurrence of “submit.”
Replace generic labels with useful subjects. Compare related rows for duplicates and decide whether child requirements form one package or separate actions. Use the review-status field to keep unresolved questions visible.
Use the technical scope as a starting point, then check subcontracts, purchase orders, delegated-design responsibilities, testing arrangements, and project-specific procurement strategy.
Enter the required-on-site or installation milestone, then account for fabrication, procurement, final approval, design review, potential resubmission, contractor coordination, and preparation. Update dates when the project schedule or procurement plan changes.
The workbook provides a practical structure; it does not review the contract documents, determine scope, calculate dates automatically, or guarantee completeness. The project team remains responsible for interpreting requirements and maintaining the working record.
Yes. You can download it without providing an email address and use it for your organization’s construction projects.
Yes. Adapt it to your project and downstream platform. We recommend retaining source references and a requirement-review status even if other fields change.
Yes. The workbook can serve as an initial register and a basic tracking log. Teams with established routing platforms may use it only during requirement discovery and planning.
It distinguishes confidence in the requirement itself from the later lifecycle status of the submitted package. An item can be verified as a requirement while its package remains not started.
Shop Drawing · Source page 412 · ¶ 1.5.B · Door Hardware Supplier
Prepare schedule organized into hardware sets indicating complete designations of every item required for each door or opening.
The action title states the deliverable. The type supports filtering. The source allows verification. Responsibility identifies the likely preparer but remains subject to project scope. The note or schedule fields can capture coordination with door, frame, access-control, and electrical requirements.
A weak alternative would be “Submit Shop Drawings.” It does not tell the team what the drawing covers, who is likely to prepare it, or which requirement supports the row.
Use filters to review one trade, section, type, status, or responsible party at a time. Protect dropdown-source cells if multiple people edit the file. Keep dates as actual Excel dates so they can be sorted and used in formulas or downstream imports.
Before import, confirm required columns, accepted status values, date formats, and identifier rules. Preserve the source page and paragraph in dedicated fields or notes even if the destination system does not include them by default.